Retiring JavaScript: A Call for Evolution in Web Development
Written on
Chapter 1: JavaScript's Dominance and Challenges
The Stack Overflow 2022 Developer Survey reveals that JavaScript has maintained its position as the most widely used programming language for the tenth consecutive year, with over 65% of developers utilizing it. However, Douglas Crockford, the creator of JSON, recently expressed concerns in an interview about JavaScript's growing complexity, suggesting it may hinder technological progress.
Crockford stated, "The best approach we can take with JavaScript today is to retire it. Two decades ago, I was one of its few advocates. The brilliance of nested functions and dynamic objects is undeniable. I dedicated a decade attempting to address its shortcomings, achieving limited success with ES5. Since then, the focus has shifted towards enhancing the language rather than improving it. Consequently, JavaScript, like other legacy languages, has become a barrier to advancement. We should pivot toward a new language that resembles E more than JavaScript."
Section 1.1: The Rise of E
E, the language Crockford proposes as a successor to JavaScript, was designed for secure computing and co-created by him and Mark Miller, among others. According to Crockford, E eliminates many of the problematic aspects of Java, presenting a more secure and manageable alternative.
Subsection 1.1.1: JavaScript's Origins
Brendan Eich invented JavaScript in a mere ten days for Netscape back in 1995. He remarked, "In May, I worked tirelessly for ten days without much sleep. I created a programming language for HTML that web designers and developers could integrate directly into their pages, and the name is misleading. It has little to do with Java; its syntax is more closely related to a shared ancestor, C." He acknowledged that it was a hasty endeavor, anticipating bugs and gaps, which led to its malleability, allowing developers to shape it according to their needs.
Section 1.2: The Complexity of Modern JavaScript
Crockford noted that JavaScript has evolved beyond Eich's original vision, growing increasingly complex as new functionalities were added. Many developers have shifted to writing TypeScript, a language designed by Anders Hejlsberg of Microsoft, which compiles down to JavaScript. This shift was born out of JavaScript's inherent malleability and its lack of type safety, making it less suitable for large-scale applications.
Chapter 2: The Future Beyond JavaScript
The first video titled "Why We Should Stop Using JavaScript According to Douglas Crockford (Inventor of JSON)" delves into the complexities and challenges posed by JavaScript, as discussed by Crockford.
The second video, "Should we Retire Javascript? - YouTube," explores the ongoing debate regarding JavaScript's relevance in modern programming.
A developer on Hacker News commented, "JavaScript has surged in popularity over a short period. The ecosystem has become overly complex. Even seasoned JavaScript developers find it difficult to keep pace."
Crockford emphasized the challenges of transitioning away from JavaScript, particularly because it is the primary language for DOM (Document Object Model) manipulation across browsers. When asked about potential replacements, he expressed hope but acknowledged two significant hurdles: "Firstly, we lack a language specifically designed for minimal-capability-based actor systems focused on secure distributed programming. Secondly, we need browser developers to adopt this language while replacing the DOM with a well-designed interface."
In response, several Reddit users echoed Crockford's sentiments, stating, "The DOM is a poor abstraction for application development, originally designed for text documents. The web's modern use cases are being constrained by a technology meant for a more limited purpose. A solution would involve replacing every browser's DOM API with one tailored for rendering 2D/3D graphics, taking discoverability, accessibility, and machine readability into account."
In conclusion, many believe that the core issue lies not just with JavaScript itself, but with the limitations of the browser concept, which does not adequately serve its intended purpose.
Thank you for reading. I look forward to your continued engagement and hope you enjoy more insightful articles.