The Enigmatic Nature of Romanticism: Exploring Wonder and Truth
Written on
The Complex Relationship Between Romanticism and Enlightenment
Romanticism is often viewed as a counter-movement to the Enlightenment, yet the reality is far more nuanced. Instead of dismissing the significance of reason and Enlightenment values, Romantic thinkers accepted these principles while simultaneously questioning certain aspects. Iain McGilchrist, in his work The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World (2010), elaborates on this distinction. He posits that while Enlightenment advocates perceived the pursuit of truth or beauty as a competitive struggle, ultimately favoring one side, Romanticism understood beauty and truth to emerge from the synthesis of opposing forces into a productive whole.
The Role of Imagination and Reason in Romantic Thought
In British Romanticism and the Critique of Political Reason (2016), Timothy Michael argues that the notion of a conflict between the imaginative faculties celebrated by Romanticism and rational thought only surfaced post-Romantic era. He contends that the defense of imagination during this period was not a rejection of reason; rather, it involved a redefinition of reason’s foundations, clarifying its boundaries to more legitimately claim knowledge.
The Perspectives of Romantic Writers on Science and Truth
Both Roslynn Haynes (1994) and Robert Richards (2002) emphasize that Romantic authors did not oppose reason or scientific inquiry. Instead, they viewed poetry and aesthetic appreciation as valuable complementary approaches to intellectual exploration, enriching human understanding of profound truths. As Haynes notes, Romantic writers firmly believed that their perspectives represented a comprehensive Truth about the universe, aspiring to an all-encompassing knowledge that would rival the Newtonian framework. They posited a vitalistic science, countering the mechanistic worldview that reduced nature and humanity to mere machine-like parts. This reductionism, from the Romantic standpoint, obscured the richness and splendor of the world.
The Value of Questions Over Answers
Romantic thinkers frequently suggested that questions hold greater intrigue than their resolutions. As William Wordsworth poignantly stated, “we murder to dissect.” Answers can strip away the enchantment and mystery surrounding existence. Romantic writers aimed to offer insights that preserved the awe of inquiry, fostering a sense of wonder and encouraging further exploration.