acelerap.com

# The Discontinuation of the 27-inch iMac: Apple's Shift to Mac Studio

Written on

Chapter 1: Apple's Product Evolution

In a move that surprised many, Apple has opted to phase out its 27-inch iMac, which was known for its high-performance capabilities. The company is continuing its integration of the M1 chip across its product line, having previously replaced the smaller 21.5-inch iMac with the same M1 chip found in the 2020 MacBook Air. It seemed logical to anticipate that the 27-inch model would also receive an upgrade to the M1 Pro or Max chip.

However, Apple introduced a different approach altogether, launching a compact desktop tower alongside a 27-inch monitor. This shift seems to communicate that Apple has developed something significantly more powerful than expected, leaving no room for an M1 variant of the 27-inch iMac.

Will we see an M1 version of the 27-inch iMac in the future? It appears unlikely, as indicated during the keynote event:

"The Mac Studio and Studio Display now join our impressive lineup featuring Apple silicon, marking our transition nearly complete with just ONE MORE product left — the Mac Pro."

  • John Ternus, SVP, Hardware Engineering

With only the Mac Pro remaining in the transition to Apple silicon, the 27-inch iMac seems to be a thing of the past.

As I scrolled through numerous tweets and YouTube comments, it became clear that consumers reacted to this unexpected product launch with mixed feelings. Many felt that Apple had produced a device laden with features that weren't necessarily in demand, coupled with a steep price.

Section 1.1: The Design Dilemma

One reason behind Apple's decision could be the design constraints of integrating an M1 Pro or Max chip into a 27-inch iMac. Such a configuration would likely lead to a thicker device, comparable in bulk to the previous Intel model. A thicker design might be deemed unattractive, while a slimmer version could suffer from reduced performance due to CPU throttling. Faced with the choice between an aesthetically pleasing yet underperforming all-in-one desktop and a bulkier but powerful device, Apple opted to discontinue the 27-inch iMac.

Section 1.2: The Strategy Behind the Shift

Another factor might be Apple's desire to push the envelope on performance. By separating the processing units into a standalone device, they can provide significant performance enhancements. The idea of doubling the M1 Max CPU's capabilities suddenly makes sense—because they are able to.

Chapter 2: Profit Motives and Market Shifts

The starting price for the 27-inch iMac was $1799 (Intel 6-Core, 8GB RAM, 256GB Storage, RX5300). In contrast, the Mac Studio starts at $1999 with the M1 Max and $3999 with the M1 Ultra. Additionally, the Studio Display is priced at $1599. To effectively "replace" the 27-inch iMac with a Mac Studio setup, customers would need to invest at least $3598, which generates a considerable profit margin for Apple.

Section 2.1: Targeting a Niche Market

Who truly requires the power of 20 CPU cores? Most average consumers and even prosumers may not notice a significant performance difference, as the lower-tier M1 variant is already remarkably fast. Apple appears to be shifting focus toward researchers, creatives, and content producers who engage in intensive computational tasks that leverage the advantages of multi-core processing.

Not convinced? Observe how Apple has marketed these products:

Advertising for high-performance computing by Apple

The advertising raises eyebrows: who has access to an 8K cinema camera, let alone nine streams of 8K footage? The needs of an average consumer seem far removed from the capabilities being promoted.

Conclusion: A Controversial Decision

How remarkable is the M1 Ultra chip? While benchmark comparisons may seem selective, Apple claims its performance outpaces the 16-core i9–12900K and RTX 3090, boasting 90% better performance than the Intel CPU while consuming 200W less power than the RTX 3090. The M1 Ultra chip is indeed among the top CPUs currently available.

However, such peak performance comes at a cost. When comparing it to the iMac Pro, which debuted in 2017 at a starting price of $4999, the new offering could be seen as more affordable. Was discontinuing the 27-inch iMac a wise choice for Apple? I would argue it wasn’t, as it was a unique all-in-one device that delivered substantial performance.

What are your thoughts? Do you prefer a high-performance all-in-one desktop or a more powerful standalone setup with a separate monitor?

Share the page:

Twitter Facebook Reddit LinkIn

-----------------------

Recent Post:

Exploring the Therapeutic Power of Writing for Healing

Discover how writing can serve as a powerful tool for healing and self-discovery, particularly for those navigating trauma and anxiety.

Navigating Your Path to Becoming Your Future Self

Discover practical steps to realize your future self through consistency, goal-setting, and self-reflection.

Introducing Myself: A Journey Through Words and Life

In this heartfelt introduction, I share my journey as a writer, my passion for crypto, and my new publication on Medium.

Transformative Narratives: Unveiling Self-Discovery and Growth

Explore the profound impact of storytelling in self-discovery and growth through transformative narratives that inspire change.

Unlocking Your Business Potential Through Mindset Transformation

Discover how a positive mindset can transform your business journey and lead to success.

Exploring Gender Dynamics in Medicine: Are Female Doctors Better?

New research indicates female hospital physicians may lead to better outcomes for patients.

A Humorous Journey of Self-Acceptance and Weight Struggles

A comical tale of weight struggles, self-acceptance, and the realization that perfection isn't necessary for happiness.

A Major Shift in Apple: iPhone Designer Joins AI Hardware Project

Apple's iPhone designer departs for an AI hardware initiative, indicating a significant shift towards artificial intelligence in tech.